OR/16/010 About the infiltration SuDS maps

Dearden, R. 2016. User guide for the infiltration SuDS map: summary. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/16/010.

Background

Following extensive flooding in 2007 across much of the UK, the Government launched a review to determine the causes and consequences of the flood events and to establish the most appropriate course of action to reduce future flooding (Pitt, 2008). The review found that intense rainfall and overland flow on impervious surfaces resulted in flooding particularly in urban areas where the piped drainage networks were overwhelmed. The impacts were not restricted to flooding; storm water flow through combined sewers (that carry both foul and surface water) overflowed to watercourses during storm events, resulting in a deterioration of water quality. To reduce the intensity and magnitude of such impacts during flood events, the review recommended that our reliance on the existing piped drainage network should be decreased. The recommendations were further considered in the Making Space for Water strategy (DEFRA, 2005) and were then enacted to law by the Floods and Water Management Act 2010 (HMSO, 2010).

One of the recommendations, enacted to law via Schedule 3 of the Floods and Water Management Act, was the specific provision for the implementation of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) in all new developments (excluding single dwellings). To promote the use of SuDS, the Act withdraws Section 106 of the Water Industry Act 1991, thereby removing the automatic right for developers to connect to the drainage network (HMSO, 2010). An exception applies to single dwellings, which are excluded from this requirement in law. However, even for single dwellings, there are significant advantages to using SuDS in practice, for example they require reduced drainage infrastructure and attract disconnection rebates for homeowners.

Sustainable drainage aims to reduce the reliance on traditional piped drainage networks by draining surface water in a way that mimics the natural water cycle, thereby decreasing flow rates and reducing peak flows to rivers. In addition, SuDS remove pollutants near to source and thereby play a key role in improving catchment water quality. There are also amenity and biodiversity benefits associated with installing SuDS instead of traditional drains (Woods-Ballard et al., 2007).

Sustainable drainage includes surface water management techniques such as:

• rainwater re-use (water butts, rainwater harvesting systems)
• rainwater storage with discharge to watercourses (detention basins/ponds/subsurface chambers), and
• infiltration to the ground (soakaways, infiltration basins, permeable pavements)

Systems often incorporate two or more SuDS techniques connected in series. This enables an incremental reduction in pollutants, flow rates and volumes along the drainage flow path. The connection of systems in this way is termed the management train.

The design, construction, operation and maintenance of SuDS have been the subject of numerous documents since the release of the draft SuDS National Standards (DEFRA, 2011). Since then, the standards have become focused on controlling the rate and quantity of flow (DEFRA, 2015). The National Planning Policy Framework has published further Planning Practice Guidance that supports sustainable drainage and suggests the following order of preference for the runoff destination:

• discharge to the ground
• discharge to a surface water body
• discharge to a surface water sewer
• discharge to a combined sewer.

To determine whether SuDS that infiltrate to the ground are compatible with the subsurface, the ground conditions at each individual site need to be assessed.

The British Geological Survey has developed two series of maps that provide information on the suitability of the subsurface for infiltration SuDS:

a. Infiltration SuDS Map: Summary

b. Infiltration SuDS Map: Detailed

This user guide focuses on the Infiltration SuDS Map: Summary. This series of maps provides screening-level data that provides an indication of the likely suitability of the ground for infiltration. It does not provide information about the properties of the subsurface.

For more detailed information about the properties of the subsurface, the Infiltration SuDS Map: Detailed (Dearden, 2016) should be consulted. Alternatively, an Infiltration to the Ground GeoReport can be obtained from http://shop.bgs.ac.uk/georeports/.

The Infiltration SuDS Map: Summary provides screening-level data for the strategic assessment of the suitability of the subsurface for infiltration SuDS. The Infiltration SuDS Map: Summary facilitates strategic decision making. The map is not a replacement for a soakaway test or site investigation.

What are infiltration suds?

Infiltration SuDS is a term that covers a number of different systems including:

• soakaways
• infiltration trenches
• infiltration basins
• permeable pavements
• wetlands
• unlined ponds, and
• unlined swales.

These systems facilitate the infiltration of surface water into the ground. Once in the ground, the water percolates through the subsurface to the groundwater.

Infiltration SuDS are appropriate in a wide variety of ground conditions, but the design must be compatible with the properties of the subsurface, in particular, the infiltration rate. Infiltration SuDS are commonly installed within freely draining ground, but they can also be used in less permeable deposits, if they are designed to incorporate larger infiltration areas (e.g. permeable pavements), or the capacity to store water (e.g. infiltration basins). By increasing the surface area or volume of the infiltration system, the amount of water infiltrated and the time over which infiltration can occur are increased. This allows infiltration SuDS to be installed in ground that would not otherwise be suitable for the installation of soakaways. In such ground conditions, infiltration may not provide the whole drainage solution, but may form part of the drainage strategy alongside SuDS that store and re-use water.

Figure 1 illustrates three types of infiltration SuDS and Table 1 summaries the characteristics of infiltration SuDS in terms of typical storage capacity, surface area for infiltration, pollutant attenuation capacity, land take requirement and amenity value.

Figure 1 Diagram to show versatility of infiltration SuDS, for example: a) soakaways in free-draining ground; b) permeable pavements incorporating water storage in moderately free-draining ground, and c) infiltration basins with large storage volumes in poorly draining ground.

Table 1 Common infiltration SuDS types. Values derived from Woods-Ballard et al. (2007).

Technique	Description	Typical storage capacity	Surface area for infiltration	Pollutant attenuation capacity	Land-take requirements	Amenity value
Infiltration basin	Comprises a depression in the ground, where water can be stored during gradual infiltration through the permeable base	High	Moderate to high	Medium to high	High, but dual use possible	Potentially high
Infiltration trench	Comprises a gravel-filled trench with a permeable base through which water can infiltrate the ground	Moderate	Moderate	Low to high	Low	Low
Permeable pavement	A durable permeable surface, through which water can infiltrate. Systems may allow infiltration directly to the ground, or may be constructed with a subbase providing storage capacity, allowing more gradual infiltration to the ground	Low to high	Low to high	High	High, but dual use normal	Potentially high
Soakaway	Metre-scale pit in the ground, that stores water during gradual infiltration	Low to moderate	Low to moderate	Low to medium	Low	Low
Wetland	Comprises a natural or man- made swampy or boggy area with a permeable base	Moderate	Moderate to high	Medium to high	High	Potentially high

Who might require this map?

This dataset is relevant to those who need to undertake a spatial assessment of the suitability of the subsurface for infiltration SuDS. The data will provide a basic assessment of the suitability of the subsurface for infiltration SuDS, but it is not sufficiently detailed to be used at the local-scale. The dataset does not provide information on the properties of the subsurface.

The Infiltration SuDS Map: Summary is relevant to professionals throughout construction, including those involved at an initial stage with planning, land surveying, architecture and construction. It may also be of interest to solicitors, loss adjusters and the insurance industry.

About the dataset

The Infiltration SuDS Map: Summary comprises four GIS layers that provide summarised answers to four key questions:

• Question 1. Are there any constraints that mean infiltration SuDS should only be used if the potential for, and consequences of flooding and geohazards are known? This GIS layer highlights those areas where geological and hydrogeological hazards may exist that could be initiated or worsened by infiltrating water to the ground. Possible hazards include:

i) ground instability resulting from the infiltration of water into rocks that are highly susceptible to landslide or collapse associated with dissolution or shallow mining;

ii) flooding resulting from infiltration into deposits where the water table is shallow and potentially able to rise causing inundation of soakaways or emergence of groundwater at the ground surface, and

iii) made ground of unknown characteristics that may be unstable or potentially contaminated.

The map does not state the type of geohazard, it simply indicates the possible presence or absence of such a hazard.

• Question 2. What is the drainage potential of the subsurface?
  The drainage potential of the ground depends on the geology and hydrogeology of the subsurface. This GIS layer provides an indication of the extent to which the ground will be suitable for infiltration SuDS with respect to drainage.
• Question 3. Are there any ground stability considerations?
  Not all ground instability hazards will preclude the installation of infiltration SuDS, but if present, those hazards should be taken into account during design and construction. This GIS layer highlights the potential for ground instability if water is infiltrated to the ground.
• Question 4. Is the groundwater susceptible to deterioration in quality?
  When designing SuDS installations the potential impact on groundwater quality should be considered. This GIS layer gives an overview of the vulnerability of the groundwater to pollutants in surface water.

The dataset is intended to provide the information required to make strategic decisions on the suitability of the ground for infiltration SuDS. The data is NOT an alternative for a site investigation or an infiltration test. If the data is to be used for local planning applications, the user should obtain the data within the Infiltration SuDS Map: Detailed.