OR/13/042 Appendix 1 - Data obtained from on-line questionnaire

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hughes, A G, Harpham, Q K, Riddick, A T, Royse, K R, and Singh, A. 2013. Meta-model: ensuring the widespread access to metadata and data for environmental models - scoping report. British Geological Survey External Report, OR/13/042.

Section One — Background information country, science discipline etc

Country affiliation

Country Number of respondents
Australia 1
Czech Republic 1
Denmark 1
France 2
Germany 4
Greece 3
Ireland 1
Italy 5
Netherlands 7
Portugal 2
Romania 1
Serbia and Montenegro 1
Spain 4
Switzerland 2
United Kingdom 63
United States 9
Uzbekistan 1
TOTAL 108

Science discipline

Discipline Number of respondents % of respondents
Climate change research 10 9.26
Earth system modelling 12 11.11
Groundwater modelling 9 8.33
Land use modelling 6 5.56
Modelling of the marine environment 12 11.11
Modelling other parts of the water cycle 16 14.81
Other 43 39.81
TOTAL 108 100

Primary activity

Primary activity Number of respondents % of respondents
Data supplier 9 8.33
End user 2 29.63
Model developer 37 34.26
Modeller 30 27.78
TOTAL 108 100.00

Section Two — Metadata for data

Question 2.1: For people searching for datasets which information is most important to identify and locate the data they need? Please rank the options below in relative importance (High, Moderate or Low).

Number of responses

High Moderate Low TOTAL
Parameters or phenomena represented 76 10 3 89
Descriptive information 71 13 4 88
Spatial extent 67 22 1 90
Units of measurement 53 20 17 90
Quality assessments 46 36 8 90
Ownership 36 43 11 90
Use licence 35 38 16 89
Reference dates 33 42 15 90
Spatial reference system 32 39 19 90
Provenance 30 49 11 90
Original purpose of the dataset 12 45 33 90

Question 2.2: Which of the following metadata standards does your data comply with?

% of respondents Number of respondents
Dublin core specification 10.59 9
ISO19110 7.06 6
ISO19115[1] 11.76 10
ISO19119 3.53 3
INSPIRE data specifications 29.41 25
PREMIS 0.00 0
Other standards 37.65 32
TOTAL 100 85

Question 2.3: Do you think that there is sufficient metadata and other supporting information made available to help people find and locate the datasets you use or supply?

Number of respondents % of respondents
No 48 54.55
Unsure 23 26.14
Yes 17 19.32
TOTAL 88 100

Question 2.4: Which of the following mechanisms do you use most often to locate and identify the data you use?

Number of respondents % of respondents
Approaching recognised suppliers of specific datasets directly 17 19.77
Other mechanisms 14 16.28
Searching via a catalogue facility (web based or otherwise) 24 27.91
Through organisations you already collaborate with 31 36.05
TOTAL 86 100

Question 2.5: When working with environmental datasets what metadata or other supporting information is most important to enable you to make effective use of the data? Please rank the options in relative importance (High, Moderate or Low).

Number of responses

High Moderate Low TOTAL
Parameters or phenomena represented 72 15 0 87
Units of measurement 67 14 6 87
Spatial extent — spatial reference system 61 22 4 87
Quality assessments 56 22 9 87
File formats available 47 32 8 87
Descriptive information (title, abstract etc) 46 27 14 87
Data formats used to store the data 42 37 8 87
Reference dates 35 36 16 87
Provenance 33 35 19 87
The software used to create the dataset 11 37 39 87
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 8 27 49 84

Question 2.6: Do you think that there is sufficient metadata and other supporting information made available to help people make effective use of the datasets you use or supply?

Number of respondents % of respondents
No 45 51.72
Yes 20 22.99
Unsure 22 25.29
TOTAL 87 100

Question 2.7: In terms of being able to both locate and use the datasets you need — if there was one thing you could improve in this process, what would it be? (64 free text responses).

Section Three — Metadata for models

Question 3.1: For people searching for models which information is most important to identify and locate the model(s) they need. Please rank the options below in relative importance (High, Moderate or Low).

Number of responses

High Moderate Low TOTAL
Descriptive information 64 10 2 76
Parameters or phenomena represented 61 14 1 76
Spatial extent 51 21 4 76
Quality assessments 41 27 8 76
Use licence 35 31 10 76
Ownership 33 31 12 76
Deterministic/probabilistic/other 33 31 12 76
Technical platform 32 29 15 76
Provenance 31 32 13 76
Original purpose of the model 27 37 12 76
Spatial reference system 26 38 12 76
Reference dates 18 47 11 76
Originating discipline 18 41 17 76
Programming languages used 16 36 24 76
Typical runtime 13 43 20 76

Question 3.2: Do you assign metadata to models according to a formal standard? If so, which standard? (43 free text responses).

Question 3.3: Do you think that there is sufficient metadata and other supporting information made available to help people make use of the models you use or supply — what could be improved?

Number of respondents % of respondents
No 40 53.33
Unsure 27 36.00
Yes 8 10.67
TOTAL 75 100

Question 3.4: When working with environmental models what metadata or other supporting information is most important to enable you to make effective use of the models?

Number of responses

High Moderate Low TOTAL
The datasets used as inputs 63 13 2 78
Parameters or phenomena represented 62 14 2 78
Assumptions made in building the model 61 17 0 78
The models used as inputs 59 13 4 76
Descriptive information 51 17 10 78
The details of the software or model code 35 28 14 77
Provenance 27 34 16 77
File formats available for input datasets 24 41 13 78
File formats available for output datasets 23 43 11 77
Compatible model coupling technologies 22 36 19 77
Additional toolkits (e.g. for visualising results) 13 50 15 78

Question 3.5: Considering information which would be useful in making effective use of environmental model, do you find this information easy to access? (47 free text responses).

Question 3.6: Do you find it easy to find models produced within other environmental disciplines?

Number of respondents % of respondents
No 43 55.13
Unsure 22 28.21
Yes 13 16.67
TOTAL 78 100

Question 3.7: What are the barriers to the wider availability of models?

Number of responses

High Medium Low TOTAL
Lack of searchable catalogues 42 30 5 77
Lack of common ways to describe models 39 33 5 77
IPR considerations 35 31 11 77
Technical issues 23 36 17 76

Question 3.8: What criteria would you use to assess the quality of a model, and its fitness for purpose? (51 free text responses).

Section Four — Additional questions

Question 4.1: If you supply metadata (or other supporting information) for your datasets and/or models what is your primary reason for doing this?

Number of respondents % of respondents
Scientific objectives 18 28.13
To assist others using the dataset/model 25 39.06
To comply with organisational or other guidelines 10 15.63
To meet longer term data preservation objectives 2 3.13
To promote access to the dataset/model 9 14.06
TOTAL 64 100

Question 4.2: If you currently provide or make use of metadata in environmental modelling, do you use a particular software tool to create or access the metadata? (39 free text responses).

References

  1. ISO19115, 2003. Geographic information — Metadata. International Standards Organisation, ref: ISO19115:2003(E).