OR/13/042 Appendix 1 - Data obtained from on-line questionnaire
Hughes, A G, Harpham, Q K, Riddick, A T, Royse, K R, and Singh, A. 2013. Meta-model: ensuring the widespread access to metadata and data for environmental models - scoping report. British Geological Survey External Report, OR/13/042. |
Section One — Background information country, science discipline etc
Country affiliation
Country | Number of respondents |
Australia | 1 |
Czech Republic | 1 |
Denmark | 1 |
France | 2 |
Germany | 4 |
Greece | 3 |
Ireland | 1 |
Italy | 5 |
Netherlands | 7 |
Portugal | 2 |
Romania | 1 |
Serbia and Montenegro | 1 |
Spain | 4 |
Switzerland | 2 |
United Kingdom | 63 |
United States | 9 |
Uzbekistan | 1 |
TOTAL | 108 |
Science discipline
Discipline | Number of respondents | % of respondents |
Climate change research | 10 | 9.26 |
Earth system modelling | 12 | 11.11 |
Groundwater modelling | 9 | 8.33 |
Land use modelling | 6 | 5.56 |
Modelling of the marine environment | 12 | 11.11 |
Modelling other parts of the water cycle | 16 | 14.81 |
Other | 43 | 39.81 |
TOTAL | 108 | 100 |
Primary activity
Primary activity | Number of respondents | % of respondents |
Data supplier | 9 | 8.33 |
End user | 2 | 29.63 |
Model developer | 37 | 34.26 |
Modeller | 30 | 27.78 |
TOTAL | 108 | 100.00 |
Section Two — Metadata for data
Question 2.1: For people searching for datasets which information is most important to identify and locate the data they need? Please rank the options below in relative importance (High, Moderate or Low).
Number of responses | ||||
High | Moderate | Low | TOTAL | |
Parameters or phenomena represented | 76 | 10 | 3 | 89 |
Descriptive information | 71 | 13 | 4 | 88 |
Spatial extent | 67 | 22 | 1 | 90 |
Units of measurement | 53 | 20 | 17 | 90 |
Quality assessments | 46 | 36 | 8 | 90 |
Ownership | 36 | 43 | 11 | 90 |
Use licence | 35 | 38 | 16 | 89 |
Reference dates | 33 | 42 | 15 | 90 |
Spatial reference system | 32 | 39 | 19 | 90 |
Provenance | 30 | 49 | 11 | 90 |
Original purpose of the dataset | 12 | 45 | 33 | 90 |
Question 2.2: Which of the following metadata standards does your data comply with?
% of respondents | Number of respondents | |
Dublin core specification | 10.59 | 9 |
ISO19110 | 7.06 | 6 |
ISO19115[1] | 11.76 | 10 |
ISO19119 | 3.53 | 3 |
INSPIRE data specifications | 29.41 | 25 |
PREMIS | 0.00 | 0 |
Other standards | 37.65 | 32 |
TOTAL | 100 | 85 |
Question 2.3: Do you think that there is sufficient metadata and other supporting information made available to help people find and locate the datasets you use or supply?
Number of respondents | % of respondents | |
No | 48 | 54.55 |
Unsure | 23 | 26.14 |
Yes | 17 | 19.32 |
TOTAL | 88 | 100 |
Question 2.4: Which of the following mechanisms do you use most often to locate and identify the data you use?
Number of respondents | % of respondents | |
Approaching recognised suppliers of specific datasets directly | 17 | 19.77 |
Other mechanisms | 14 | 16.28 |
Searching via a catalogue facility (web based or otherwise) | 24 | 27.91 |
Through organisations you already collaborate with | 31 | 36.05 |
TOTAL | 86 | 100 |
Question 2.5: When working with environmental datasets what metadata or other supporting information is most important to enable you to make effective use of the data? Please rank the options in relative importance (High, Moderate or Low).
Number of responses | ||||
High | Moderate | Low | TOTAL | |
Parameters or phenomena represented | 72 | 15 | 0 | 87 |
Units of measurement | 67 | 14 | 6 | 87 |
Spatial extent — spatial reference system | 61 | 22 | 4 | 87 |
Quality assessments | 56 | 22 | 9 | 87 |
File formats available | 47 | 32 | 8 | 87 |
Descriptive information (title, abstract etc) | 46 | 27 | 14 | 87 |
Data formats used to store the data | 42 | 37 | 8 | 87 |
Reference dates | 35 | 36 | 16 | 87 |
Provenance | 33 | 35 | 19 | 87 |
The software used to create the dataset | 11 | 37 | 39 | 87 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | 8 | 27 | 49 | 84 |
Question 2.6: Do you think that there is sufficient metadata and other supporting information made available to help people make effective use of the datasets you use or supply?
Number of respondents | % of respondents | |
No | 45 | 51.72 |
Yes | 20 | 22.99 |
Unsure | 22 | 25.29 |
TOTAL | 87 | 100 |
Question 2.7: In terms of being able to both locate and use the datasets you need — if there was one thing you could improve in this process, what would it be? (64 free text responses).
Section Three — Metadata for models
Question 3.1: For people searching for models which information is most important to identify and locate the model(s) they need. Please rank the options below in relative importance (High, Moderate or Low).
Number of responses | ||||
High | Moderate | Low | TOTAL | |
Descriptive information | 64 | 10 | 2 | 76 |
Parameters or phenomena represented | 61 | 14 | 1 | 76 |
Spatial extent | 51 | 21 | 4 | 76 |
Quality assessments | 41 | 27 | 8 | 76 |
Use licence | 35 | 31 | 10 | 76 |
Ownership | 33 | 31 | 12 | 76 |
Deterministic/probabilistic/other | 33 | 31 | 12 | 76 |
Technical platform | 32 | 29 | 15 | 76 |
Provenance | 31 | 32 | 13 | 76 |
Original purpose of the model | 27 | 37 | 12 | 76 |
Spatial reference system | 26 | 38 | 12 | 76 |
Reference dates | 18 | 47 | 11 | 76 |
Originating discipline | 18 | 41 | 17 | 76 |
Programming languages used | 16 | 36 | 24 | 76 |
Typical runtime | 13 | 43 | 20 | 76 |
Question 3.2: Do you assign metadata to models according to a formal standard? If so, which standard? (43 free text responses).
Question 3.3: Do you think that there is sufficient metadata and other supporting information made available to help people make use of the models you use or supply — what could be improved?
Number of respondents | % of respondents | |
No | 40 | 53.33 |
Unsure | 27 | 36.00 |
Yes | 8 | 10.67 |
TOTAL | 75 | 100 |
Question 3.4: When working with environmental models what metadata or other supporting information is most important to enable you to make effective use of the models?
Number of responses | ||||
High | Moderate | Low | TOTAL | |
The datasets used as inputs | 63 | 13 | 2 | 78 |
Parameters or phenomena represented | 62 | 14 | 2 | 78 |
Assumptions made in building the model | 61 | 17 | 0 | 78 |
The models used as inputs | 59 | 13 | 4 | 76 |
Descriptive information | 51 | 17 | 10 | 78 |
The details of the software or model code | 35 | 28 | 14 | 77 |
Provenance | 27 | 34 | 16 | 77 |
File formats available for input datasets | 24 | 41 | 13 | 78 |
File formats available for output datasets | 23 | 43 | 11 | 77 |
Compatible model coupling technologies | 22 | 36 | 19 | 77 |
Additional toolkits (e.g. for visualising results) | 13 | 50 | 15 | 78 |
Question 3.5: Considering information which would be useful in making effective use of environmental model, do you find this information easy to access? (47 free text responses).
Question 3.6: Do you find it easy to find models produced within other environmental disciplines?
Number of respondents | % of respondents | |
No | 43 | 55.13 |
Unsure | 22 | 28.21 |
Yes | 13 | 16.67 |
TOTAL | 78 | 100 |
Question 3.7: What are the barriers to the wider availability of models?
Number of responses | ||||
High | Medium | Low | TOTAL | |
Lack of searchable catalogues | 42 | 30 | 5 | 77 |
Lack of common ways to describe models | 39 | 33 | 5 | 77 |
IPR considerations | 35 | 31 | 11 | 77 |
Technical issues | 23 | 36 | 17 | 76 |
Question 3.8: What criteria would you use to assess the quality of a model, and its fitness for purpose? (51 free text responses).
Section Four — Additional questions
Question 4.1: If you supply metadata (or other supporting information) for your datasets and/or models what is your primary reason for doing this?
Number of respondents | % of respondents | |
Scientific objectives | 18 | 28.13 |
To assist others using the dataset/model | 25 | 39.06 |
To comply with organisational or other guidelines | 10 | 15.63 |
To meet longer term data preservation objectives | 2 | 3.13 |
To promote access to the dataset/model | 9 | 14.06 |
TOTAL | 64 | 100 |
Question 4.2: If you currently provide or make use of metadata in environmental modelling, do you use a particular software tool to create or access the metadata? (39 free text responses).
References
- ↑ ISO19115, 2003. Geographic information — Metadata. International Standards Organisation, ref: ISO19115:2003(E).