OR/14/043 Conclusions: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ajhil (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Dbk (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision imported
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 08:16, 5 April 2016

Farr, G, Graham, J, and Stratford, C. 2014. Survey, characterisation and condition assessment of Palustriella dominated springs 'H7220 Petrifying springs with tufa formation (Cratoneurion)' in Wales. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/14/043.

Palustiella dominated vegetation (based on 27 samples) has loosely been divided into 2 main groups and 4 subgroups. The two main groups (1 and 2) are shown to differ generally in respect to dominanace of individual Palustriella species, attitude, site ‘openness’ and number of flowering plant species. The two groups also correlate well to NVC M38 and M37 communities respectively.

Palustriella dominated spring vegetation is an interesting habitat due to its strong topographical and hydrogeological components, is generally not species rich (6–52 species) and has very few species of conservation concern although Blysmus compressus (not recorded during the present survey) is an associated species of conservation concern listed as vulnerable in the Red Data Book (Cheffings & Farrell, 2005[1]). Microtopography is an important factor influencing the character and structure of Palustriella dominated springs.

The presence of tufa is not considered to be a contolling factor in the occurance of Palustriella dominated springs and NVC M37/M38 communities. It is noted that this could be problematic as it does not fit with the European Commission definition of the Annex I habitat H7220 Petrifying springs with tufa formation (Cratoneurion) as being ‘springs with active formation of tufa’.

The sites were divided into Group 1 and Group 2 and the key defining features of each group are summarized in Table 115.

All but one of the sites surveyed were considered to be in favourable ecological condition and all of the sites were considered to be in good hydrological condition, the results are presented in Table 116.

Table 115    Summary of key ecohydrolgoical divisions between Group 1 and Group 2
Group 1 Group 2
Key species Dominantly Palustriella falcata Only Palustriella commutata
NVC Community M 38 M 37
Elevation Upland Lo wland
Elevation range 275–690 ma OD 5–402 ma OD
Average Elevation 426 ma OD 85 ma OD
Vegetation:

Total species
Flowering plants*
Small Carex species

Often with Festuca ovina

21–52
11–27
2–3

Often with Festuca rubra

5–20
1–10
0–2

Flow Smaller flows (<0.1–0.5 l/s) ‘Larger’ flows (<0.1–1 l/s)
Occurrence of tufa Less tufa — some sites with no tufa More tufa — often deposited in significant quantities under natural conditions
Water chemistry Less base rich (as bicarbonate)? More base rich (as bicarbonate)?
Water Quality Low nutrient levels higher nutrient levels
Openness of site Open Typically not open (incl. woodland, cliffs and gorges)
Land use Upland/common land Lowland agricultural
Grazing pressure Significant Low or none (incl. Many vertical sites)
Ecological Pressures 2 sites (Nant Peris 1 and 2) with invasive alien Epilobium brunescens No pressures identified
Hydrological Pressures No pressures identified No pressures identified
* flowering plants (including club mosses, horsetails and true ferns)


Table 116    Summary of ecological and hydrological status
Site Tufa forming? Qualify as habitat H7220 Ecological condition Hydrological Status Overall condition
Foel Fawr Site 1 Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Foel Fawr Site 2 Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Foel Fawr: Foel Garnach v.small area Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Foel Fawr: Brest Rhiw Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Pont Clydach 1 No Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Pont Clydach 2 No Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Pont Clydach 3 No Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Blaen Onneu Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Llyn y Fan Fach 1 v.small on one plant Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Llyn y Fan Fach 2 Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Cwm Clydach Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Waun Ddu/Craig y Cilau No Yes Favourable Good Favorable
Tarren y Esgob Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Hen Allt Common Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Cors Erdderiniog 7A Pipe Yes NO — minimal size of Palustriella veg Favourable Good Favourable
Cors Erdderiniog Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Cors Erdderiniog Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Cors Erdderiniog F Yes NO — minimal size of Palustriella veg Favourable Good Favourable
Fedw Fawr Beach 1 Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Fedw Fawr Beach 2 Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Fedw Fawr Beach 3 Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
Ddol Uchaf Yes NO — minimal size of Palustriella veg Favourable Good Favourable
McWalters Dingle 1 Yes Yes Favourable Good Favourable
McWalters Dingle 2 Yes NO — minimal size of Palustriella veg Favourable Good Favourable
Nant Peris 1 and 2 No Yes Unfavourable Good Unfavourable
Nant Peris 3 No Yes Favourable Good Favourable

References

  1. CHEFFINGS, C M, and FARRELL L. 2005. The vascular plant red data list for Great Britain. JNCC.