OR/17/029 Appendix 3 – Individual district results: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Dbk (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision imported
Dbk (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "[[Category:OR/17/029 UPGro Hidden Crisis Research Consortium: Unravelling past failures for future success in Rural Water Supply - Survey 1 Country Report – Uganda" to "[[Category:OR/17/029 UPGro hidden crisis research consortium: Unravelling past failures for future success in rural water supply - Survey 1 Country Report – Uganda"
 
Line 70: Line 70:
</center>
</center>
      
      
[[Category:OR/17/029 UPGro Hidden Crisis Research Consortium: Unravelling past failures for future success in Rural Water Supply - Survey 1 Country Report – Uganda | 10]]
[[Category:OR/17/029 UPGro hidden crisis research consortium: Unravelling past failures for future success in rural water supply - Survey 1 Country Report – Uganda | 10]]

Latest revision as of 14:49, 10 January 2018

Owor M, MacDonald A M, Bonsor H C, Okullo J, Katusiime F, Alupo G, Berochan G, Tumusiime C, Lapworth D, Whaley L, Lark R M. 2017. UPGro Hidden Crisis Research Consortium — Survey 1 Country Report–Uganda . British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/17/029.
Functionality performance level Budaka (%) Dokolo (%) Kumi (%) Lira (%) Luwero (%) Mbarara (%) Mityana (%) Oyam (%) Rakai (%) Rukungiri (%)
Basic – working (yes/no)

60

80

75

60

75

50

50

60

35

40

Snapshot – provides sufficient
yield (10 L/min)

10

35

35

35

60

40

30

45

25

10

Functionality performance – sufficient
yield and reliability (<30 days downtime in
last year)

5

25

25

30

35

30

15

30

15

10

Functionality including
water quality
(passes WHO inorganic
parameters, and TTC)

5

25

10

20

35

15

15

30

10

5