OR/14/029 Uncertainty: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "The model is not easy to assess in terms of uncertainty because the borehole data, reference material and geological knowledge that went into the model are difficult to repres..." |
m Protected "OR/14/029 Uncertainty" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading] |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:OR/14/029}} | |||
The model is not easy to assess in terms of uncertainty because the borehole data, reference material and geological knowledge that went into the model are difficult to represent. The borehole data used in the model is displayed in Figure 6. However, whilst showing the distribution and density of boreholes, this does not convey the depth of the borehole, the quality of the log itself or the reliability of the borehole coding. | The model is not easy to assess in terms of uncertainty because the borehole data, reference material and geological knowledge that went into the model are difficult to represent. The borehole data used in the model is displayed in Figure 6. However, whilst showing the distribution and density of boreholes, this does not convey the depth of the borehole, the quality of the log itself or the reliability of the borehole coding. | ||
[[Category:OR/14/029 The London Basin superficial and bedrock LithoFrame 50 model| 08]] | [[Category:OR/14/029 The London Basin superficial and bedrock LithoFrame 50 model| 08]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:42, 11 March 2015
| H Burke, S J Mathers, J P Williamson, S Thorpe, J Ford and R L Terrington. 2014. The London Basin superficial and bedrock LithoFrame 50 Model. Nottingham, UK, British geological Survey. |
The model is not easy to assess in terms of uncertainty because the borehole data, reference material and geological knowledge that went into the model are difficult to represent. The borehole data used in the model is displayed in Figure 6. However, whilst showing the distribution and density of boreholes, this does not convey the depth of the borehole, the quality of the log itself or the reliability of the borehole coding.