OR/14/011 Introduction: Difference between revisions
Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{OR/14/011}} The Dynamic Environmental Sensitivity to Change (DESC) project coupled cellular automaton (CA) modelling from various backgrounds and produced the CAES..." |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{OR/14/011}} | {{OR/14/011}} | ||
The Dynamic Environmental Sensitivity to Change (DESC) project coupled cellular automaton (CA) modelling from various backgrounds and produced the CAESAR-Lisflood-DESC (CLiDE) modelling platform: a geomorphological simulator that allows a variety of Earth system interactions to be explored. A derived version of the well established Cellular Automaton Evolutionary Slope and River (CAESAR) model (Coulthard and Van De Wiel, 2006), CAESAR-Lisflood, which incorporates the Lisflood hydrodymanic model (Coulthard et | ==Background== | ||
The Dynamic Environmental Sensitivity to Change (DESC) project coupled cellular automaton (CA) modelling from various backgrounds and produced the CAESAR-Lisflood-DESC (CLiDE) modelling platform: a geomorphological simulator that allows a variety of Earth system interactions to be explored. A derived version of the well established Cellular Automaton Evolutionary Slope and River (CAESAR) model (Coulthard and Van De Wiel, 2006<ref name="Coulthard 2006">Coulthard, T J, and Van de Wiel, M J. 2006. A cellular model of river meandering. Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 31, 123–132.</ref>), CAESAR-Lisflood, which incorporates the Lisflood hydrodymanic model (Coulthard et al., 2013<ref name="Coulthard 2013">Coulthard, T J. 2013. https://sourceforge.net/projects/caesar-lisflood/ (accessed 15th February 2014).</ref>) to simulate channel and overbank flow, is used as the platform kernel. The two dimensional modular design allows great versatility in the range of simulated spatio-temporal scales to which it can be applied. CAESAR has been used to investigate a variety of sediment transport, erosional and depositional processes under differing climatic and land use pressures in river reaches and catchments (Hancock et at., 2011<ref name="Hancock 2011">Hancock, G R, Coulthard, T J, Martinez, C, and Kalma, J D. 2011. An evaluation of landscape evolution models to simulate decadal and centennial scale soil erosion in grassland catchments. J. Hydrol., 308, 171–183.</ref>). The recent addition of Lisflood to the code improves the representation of surface water flow within the model by incorporating momentum. However, as with many landscape evolution models (LEMs), CAESAR over-simplifies the representation of some of the hydrological processes and interactions that drive sediment transport. Specifically, it does not simulate groundwater flow and its discharge to rivers. To address these limitations, the non-Lisflood controlled surface hydrological processes within the CLiDE platform are replaced with a bespoke distributed hydrological model that includes a groundwater model. This hydrological model partitions rainfall between surface run-off and recharge to groundwater using a soil water balance model, which is applied at each grid cell. To simulate groundwater flow to river channels we incorporate a single layer finite difference model into the code. This solves the governing partial differential groundwater flow equation using a forward time-stepping, or explicit, solution method (Wang and Anderson, 1982<ref name="Wang 1982">Wang, J F, and Anderson, M P. 1982. Introduction to Groundwater Modelling. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.</ref>), which can be considered as a cellular automaton (CA) model (Ravazzani et al., 2011<ref name="Ravazzani 2011">Ravazzani, G, Rametta, D, and Mancini, M, 2011. Macroscopic cellular automata for groundwater modelling: A first approach. Environ. Modell. Softw., 26 (5), 634–643.</ref>). The groundwater model is coupled to the surface model through the exchange of recharge and baseflow. In addition to the hydrological modifications, a debris flow component has been added to the platform. The triggering aspect of this component is linked to simulated groundwater levels. | |||
==User guide== | |||
This manual is designed to guide a new user through the process of setting up the CLiDE platform for a desired catchment, calibrating the model and undertaking a simulation. Also included is an explanation of the governing components of the CLiDE platform, the required input files and a troubleshooting section. Post-processing is not explicitly discussed, as this process is individual to each project, however a description of the output files is provided to aid this process. | |||
[[Category:OR/14/011 | ==References== | ||
<References/> | |||
[[Category:OR/14/011 CLiDE version 1.0 user guide | 01]] |
Latest revision as of 12:31, 8 March 2022
Barkwith, A* and Coulthard, T J**. 2011. CLiDE version 1.0 user guide. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/14/011. *British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK |
Background
The Dynamic Environmental Sensitivity to Change (DESC) project coupled cellular automaton (CA) modelling from various backgrounds and produced the CAESAR-Lisflood-DESC (CLiDE) modelling platform: a geomorphological simulator that allows a variety of Earth system interactions to be explored. A derived version of the well established Cellular Automaton Evolutionary Slope and River (CAESAR) model (Coulthard and Van De Wiel, 2006[1]), CAESAR-Lisflood, which incorporates the Lisflood hydrodymanic model (Coulthard et al., 2013[2]) to simulate channel and overbank flow, is used as the platform kernel. The two dimensional modular design allows great versatility in the range of simulated spatio-temporal scales to which it can be applied. CAESAR has been used to investigate a variety of sediment transport, erosional and depositional processes under differing climatic and land use pressures in river reaches and catchments (Hancock et at., 2011[3]). The recent addition of Lisflood to the code improves the representation of surface water flow within the model by incorporating momentum. However, as with many landscape evolution models (LEMs), CAESAR over-simplifies the representation of some of the hydrological processes and interactions that drive sediment transport. Specifically, it does not simulate groundwater flow and its discharge to rivers. To address these limitations, the non-Lisflood controlled surface hydrological processes within the CLiDE platform are replaced with a bespoke distributed hydrological model that includes a groundwater model. This hydrological model partitions rainfall between surface run-off and recharge to groundwater using a soil water balance model, which is applied at each grid cell. To simulate groundwater flow to river channels we incorporate a single layer finite difference model into the code. This solves the governing partial differential groundwater flow equation using a forward time-stepping, or explicit, solution method (Wang and Anderson, 1982[4]), which can be considered as a cellular automaton (CA) model (Ravazzani et al., 2011[5]). The groundwater model is coupled to the surface model through the exchange of recharge and baseflow. In addition to the hydrological modifications, a debris flow component has been added to the platform. The triggering aspect of this component is linked to simulated groundwater levels.
User guide
This manual is designed to guide a new user through the process of setting up the CLiDE platform for a desired catchment, calibrating the model and undertaking a simulation. Also included is an explanation of the governing components of the CLiDE platform, the required input files and a troubleshooting section. Post-processing is not explicitly discussed, as this process is individual to each project, however a description of the output files is provided to aid this process.
References
- ↑ Coulthard, T J, and Van de Wiel, M J. 2006. A cellular model of river meandering. Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 31, 123–132.
- ↑ Coulthard, T J. 2013. https://sourceforge.net/projects/caesar-lisflood/ (accessed 15th February 2014).
- ↑ Hancock, G R, Coulthard, T J, Martinez, C, and Kalma, J D. 2011. An evaluation of landscape evolution models to simulate decadal and centennial scale soil erosion in grassland catchments. J. Hydrol., 308, 171–183.
- ↑ Wang, J F, and Anderson, M P. 1982. Introduction to Groundwater Modelling. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- ↑ Ravazzani, G, Rametta, D, and Mancini, M, 2011. Macroscopic cellular automata for groundwater modelling: A first approach. Environ. Modell. Softw., 26 (5), 634–643.