OR/14/035 Model assumptions and geological rules used: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "__notoc__ {{OR/14/035}} The model covered the superficial deposits overlying the Sherwood Sandstone and the underlying bedrock was not modelled in detail. Instead a ‘base mo..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__notoc__ | __notoc__ | ||
{{OR/14/035}} | {{OR/14/035}} | ||
The model covered the superficial deposits overlying the Sherwood Sandstone and the underlying bedrock was not modelled in detail. Instead a ‘base model’ was constructed with an arbitrary cut-off point at - | The model covered the superficial deposits overlying the Sherwood Sandstone and the underlying bedrock was not modelled in detail. Instead a ‘base model’ was constructed with an arbitrary cut-off point at -35 m. The area of bedrock shown in the model is coloured grey so as not to be confused with other modelled units. | ||
[[category: OR/14/035 Model metadata report for the EA Tees 3d Model | 07]] | [[category: OR/14/035 Model metadata report for the EA Tees 3d Model | 07]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:51, 10 August 2015
| THORPE, S, BURKE, H, WHITBREAD, K. 2013. Model metadata report for the EA Tees 3d Model. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/14/035. |
The model covered the superficial deposits overlying the Sherwood Sandstone and the underlying bedrock was not modelled in detail. Instead a ‘base model’ was constructed with an arbitrary cut-off point at -35 m. The area of bedrock shown in the model is coloured grey so as not to be confused with other modelled units.