Bibliographical references: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jeth1 (talk | contribs)
autoreview, Bureaucrats, commentadmin, editor, reviewer, Administrators
684 edits
No edit summary
Dbk (talk | contribs)
Image-reviewer, administrator, autoreview, Bots, Bureaucrats, commentadmin, editor, Interface administrators, reviewer, smwadministrator, smwcurator, Administrators, Upload Wizard campaign editors, widgeteditor
18,104 edits
m Text replace - "BritGeoWiki" to "Earthwise<sup>TM</sup>"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
See Notes for Authors p. 10–17 for general guidance on BGS house style.
The '''Harvard referencing system''' is preferred in Earthwise<sup>TM</sup> with references at the foot of the page. In a multi-page topic it may be preferable to link to a reference list on a separate page within the category.
Use Endnote with the BGS house style filter to format references using the
website body text font.


[[Category:BritGeoWiki writers' guide]]
BGS authors generating content in the internal GeoSource system should use '''Endnote''' and the '''Whatever''' extension.
 
[[category:Earthwise writers' guide]]

Latest revision as of 11:45, 30 July 2014

The Harvard referencing system is preferred in EarthwiseTM with references at the foot of the page. In a multi-page topic it may be preferable to link to a reference list on a separate page within the category.

BGS authors generating content in the internal GeoSource system should use Endnote and the Whatever extension.

Retrieved from "http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Bibliographical_references&oldid=5890"