<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=OR%2F17%2F048_Conclusions</id>
	<title>OR/17/048 Conclusions - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=OR%2F17%2F048_Conclusions"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=OR/17/048_Conclusions&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T00:42:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=OR/17/048_Conclusions&amp;diff=33216&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Dbk: 1 revision imported</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=OR/17/048_Conclusions&amp;diff=33216&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2017-12-14T12:00:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:00, 14 December 2017&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-notice&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dbk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=OR/17/048_Conclusions&amp;diff=33215&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ajhil at 08:11, 21 September 2017</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise-staging.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=OR/17/048_Conclusions&amp;diff=33215&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2017-09-21T08:11:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{OR/17/048}}&lt;br /&gt;
Despite some variability in S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; due to the strata and measurement techniques the available data indicates that the UK landmass is predominantly a strike slip faulting environment with possible indicators of reverse faulting above 1200&amp;amp;nbsp;m (though these are largely confined to igneous rocks in Cornwall, Cumbria and Leicestershire).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pore pressure observations across all regions studied, largely support the assumption of hydrostatic pore pressure with a gradient of 10.19&amp;amp;nbsp;MPakm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, with only a small number of measurements indicating overpressure e.g. Marishes 1 (1700&amp;amp;nbsp;m). However, given that there data is constrained both spatially and stratigraphically these may have be from isolated or impermeable units. These data do not show significant or under pressure in Cheshire, Lancashire, East Yorkshire or North Nottinghamshire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vertical stress gradients ([[Media:OR17048fig20.jpg|Figure&amp;amp;nbsp;20]]) and values from LOT’s and FIT’s across the different regions show that the gradient of both S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is two MPakm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; higher in Cheshire and Lancashire when compared to East Yorkshire or North Nottinghamshire. However, XLOT’s or laboratory test data are required to validate the estimates of S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general trend of S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; from the leak off tests appears to show the S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; indicating a predominantly strike-slip regime. There is a larger variation in the recorded values of S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the Permo–Triassic strata of the UK than the Carboniferous, with S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaching the value of S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and in some cases ≥ S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are observations from hydraulic fracturing and overcoring which may suggest greater variation in stress field orientation than recorded in Kingdon et al (2016)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kingdon 2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kingdon, A, Fellgett, M W, and Williams, J D O. 2016. Use of borehole imaging to improve understanding of the in-situ stress orientation of Central and Northern England and its implications&lt;br /&gt;
for unconventional hydrocarbon resources. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Marine and Petroleum Geology&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 73, 1–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.02.012    &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. However this study focused on borehole imaging datasets which are stratigraphically limited. Borehole imaging data from within the Carboniferous succession indicates that across the areas of interest the S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orientation is likely to be NW–SE.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; data from hydraulic fracturing, overcoring and borehole breakouts data plot above S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (23&amp;amp;nbsp;MPakm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) with a three exceptions. This is indicative of a strike-slip regime. However, there are substantial variations in the overcoring data and there are errors associated with hydraulic fracturing data, particularly when used to estimate S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (Zoback, 2010&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Zoback 2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Zoback, M D. 2010. Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the available data there appears to be similarities in the stress field across the UK, pore pressure is hydrostatic with a gradient of 10.19&amp;amp;nbsp;MPakm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vertical stress gradient for the Weald, East Yorkshire and North Nottinghamshire is 23&amp;amp;nbsp;MPakm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and varies from values of 25–26&amp;amp;nbsp;MPakm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; recorded for areas of Cheshire and Lancashire and Scotland. Data derived from LOT, hydraulic fracture data and S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; calculated from borehole breakouts, collectively indicate a strike-slip faulting regime (S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). However at depths of &amp;lt;1&amp;amp;nbsp;km there is greater uncertainty in the relation between S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hmin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HMax&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Stress magnitude data from the Triassic appears to show a greater variation than data from Carboniferous successions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the data is geographically constrained and sourced from legacy data, and more information will help to better characterise the UK stress field.&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: OR/17/048 State of stress across UK regions | 08]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ajhil</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>