OR/15/015 Introduction - Revision history

Dbk at 14:03, 27 July 2015

2015-07-27T14:03:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 27 July 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	A detailed account of the methodology is provided by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark 2012"></ref> and this report should be read in conjunction with that paper to give a complete explanation of the approach. This report provides additional information where required. the key parameters of the geostatistical models that were estimated for the rMCZ, and summaries of results.		A detailed account of the methodology is provided by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark 2012"></ref> and this report should be read in conjunction with that paper to give a complete explanation of the approach. This report provides additional information where required. the key parameters of the geostatistical models that were estimated for the rMCZ, and summaries of results.

			==References==

	[[category: OR/15/015 Mapping seabed sediments of the Fulmar rMCZ\| 02]]		[[category: OR/15/015 Mapping seabed sediments of the Fulmar rMCZ\| 02]]

Dbk at 14:02, 27 July 2015

2015-07-27T14:02:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 27 July 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The methodology is based on that reported by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark 2012">LARK, R M, DOVE, D, GREEN, S, RICHARDSON, A E, STEWART, H, and STEVENSON, A. 2012. Spatial prediction of seabed sediment texture classes by cokriging from a legacy database of point observations. ''Sedimentary Geology'', Vol. 281, 35–49. </ref>. The required outputs are predicted values on a grid of mud, gravel and sand content with associated measures of confidence, and estimated probabilities for each of the four EUNIS level 3 sediment texture classes: Mud and sandy mud, Sand and muddy sand, Coarse Sediment and Mixed Sediment (Long, 2006<ref name="Long">LONG, D. 2006. BGS Detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification. MESH (Mapping European Seabed Habitats) available at http://www.searchmesh.net/PDF/GMHM3_Detailed_explanation_of_seabed_sediment_classification.pdf</ref>) and the most probable class indicated.		The methodology is based on that reported by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark 2012">LARK, R M, DOVE, D, GREEN, S, RICHARDSON, A E, STEWART, H, and STEVENSON, A. 2012. Spatial prediction of seabed sediment texture classes by cokriging from a legacy database of point observations. ''Sedimentary Geology'', Vol. 281, 35–49. </ref>. The required outputs are predicted values on a grid of mud, gravel and sand content with associated measures of confidence, and estimated probabilities for each of the four EUNIS level 3 sediment texture classes: Mud and sandy mud, Sand and muddy sand, Coarse Sediment and Mixed Sediment (Long, 2006<ref name="Long">LONG, D. 2006. BGS Detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification. MESH (Mapping European Seabed Habitats) available at http://www.searchmesh.net/PDF/GMHM3_Detailed_explanation_of_seabed_sediment_classification.pdf</ref>) and the most probable class indicated.

	A detailed account of the methodology is provided by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark"></ref> and this report should be read in conjunction with that paper to give a complete explanation of the approach. This report provides additional information where required. the key parameters of the geostatistical models that were estimated for the rMCZ, and summaries of results.		A detailed account of the methodology is provided by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark 2012"></ref> and this report should be read in conjunction with that paper to give a complete explanation of the approach. This report provides additional information where required. the key parameters of the geostatistical models that were estimated for the rMCZ, and summaries of results.


	[[category: OR/15/015 Mapping seabed sediments of the Fulmar rMCZ\| 02]]		[[category: OR/15/015 Mapping seabed sediments of the Fulmar rMCZ\| 02]]

Dbk at 14:02, 27 July 2015

2015-07-27T14:02:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 27 July 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This report is on work undertaken for the JNCC under an Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 20 February 2014 between The Scottish Ministers, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and JNCC Support co. (JNCC). Under the terms of this Addendum JNCC requested that BGS carry out geostatistical analysis of sediment sample data from CEND 8/12 survey of Fulmar rMCZ in order to produce maps of sediment distribution in the site.		This report is on work undertaken for the JNCC under an Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 20 February 2014 between The Scottish Ministers, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and JNCC Support co. (JNCC). Under the terms of this Addendum JNCC requested that BGS carry out geostatistical analysis of sediment sample data from CEND 8/12 survey of Fulmar rMCZ in order to produce maps of sediment distribution in the site.

	The methodology is based on that reported by Lark et al. (2012). The required outputs are predicted values on a grid of mud, gravel and sand content with associated measures of confidence, and estimated probabilities for each of the four EUNIS level 3 sediment texture classes: Mud and sandy mud, Sand and muddy sand, Coarse Sediment and Mixed Sediment (Long, 2006) and the most probable class indicated.		The methodology is based on that reported by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark 2012">LARK, R M, DOVE, D, GREEN, S, RICHARDSON, A E, STEWART, H, and STEVENSON, A. 2012. Spatial prediction of seabed sediment texture classes by cokriging from a legacy database of point observations. ''Sedimentary Geology'', Vol. 281, 35–49. </ref>. The required outputs are predicted values on a grid of mud, gravel and sand content with associated measures of confidence, and estimated probabilities for each of the four EUNIS level 3 sediment texture classes: Mud and sandy mud, Sand and muddy sand, Coarse Sediment and Mixed Sediment (Long, 2006<ref name="Long">LONG, D. 2006. BGS Detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification. MESH (Mapping European Seabed Habitats) available at http://www.searchmesh.net/PDF/GMHM3_Detailed_explanation_of_seabed_sediment_classification.pdf</ref>) and the most probable class indicated.

	A detailed account of the methodology is provided by Lark et al. (2012) and this report should be read in conjunction with that paper to give a complete explanation of the approach. This report provides additional information where required. the key parameters of the geostatistical models that were estimated for the rMCZ, and summaries of results.		A detailed account of the methodology is provided by Lark et al. (2012)<ref name="Lark"></ref> and this report should be read in conjunction with that paper to give a complete explanation of the approach. This report provides additional information where required. the key parameters of the geostatistical models that were estimated for the rMCZ, and summaries of results.


	[[category: OR/15/015 Mapping seabed sediments of the Fulmar rMCZ\| 02]]		[[category: OR/15/015 Mapping seabed sediments of the Fulmar rMCZ\| 02]]

Dbk: Created page with "notoc {{OR/15/015}} This report is on work undertaken for the JNCC under an Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 20 February 2014 between The Scottish Ministers,..."

2015-05-07T13:35:58Z

Created page with "__notoc__ {{OR/15/015}} This report is on work undertaken for the JNCC under an Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 20 February 2014 between The Scottish Ministers,..."

New page

__notoc__
{{OR/15/015}}
This report is on work undertaken for the JNCC under an Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 20 February 2014 between The Scottish Ministers, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and JNCC Support co. (JNCC). Under the terms of this Addendum JNCC requested that BGS carry out geostatistical analysis of sediment sample data from CEND 8/12 survey of Fulmar rMCZ in order to produce maps of sediment distribution in the site.

The methodology is based on that reported by Lark et al. (2012). The required outputs are predicted values on a grid of mud, gravel and sand content with associated measures of confidence, and estimated probabilities for each of the four EUNIS level 3 sediment texture classes: Mud and sandy mud, Sand and muddy sand, Coarse Sediment and Mixed Sediment (Long, 2006) and the most probable class indicated.

A detailed account of the methodology is provided by Lark et al. (2012) and this report should be read in conjunction with that paper to give a complete explanation of the approach. This report provides additional information where required. the key parameters of the geostatistical models that were estimated for the rMCZ, and summaries of results.

[[category: OR/15/015 Mapping seabed sediments of the Fulmar rMCZ| 02]]

OR/15/015 Introduction - Revision history

Dbk at 14:03, 27 July 2015

Dbk at 14:02, 27 July 2015

Dbk at 14:02, 27 July 2015

Dbk: Created page with "__notoc__ {{OR/15/015}} This report is on work undertaken for the JNCC under an Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 20 February 2014 between The Scottish Ministers,..."

Dbk: Created page with "notoc {{OR/15/015}} This report is on work undertaken for the JNCC under an Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 20 February 2014 between The Scottish Ministers,..."