OR/13/001 Modelled surfaces/volumes - Revision history

Ajhil at 11:56, 4 August 2021

2021-08-04T11:56:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 4 August 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:

	{\|		{\|
	\| '''~~code name~~'''		\| '''CODE NAME'''
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
Line 101:		Line 101:
	Multiple layers of storm beach deposits were needed to cope with interdigitated sequences and Holocene evolution. The Anglian glacigenic sediments shown above in blue comprise the Lowestoft Formation and within them a single lens is identified (gsg1). Legend colours in many cases loosely correspond to the 50K published map sheets. The difficulty in separating the thin Thanet Sand Formation from the Reading Formation (Lambeth Group) has resulted in the use of the older Lower London Tertiaries term being used for this package of strata. The Harwich and London Clay Formations cannot be mapped out separately and are lumped together as the Thames Group.		Multiple layers of storm beach deposits were needed to cope with interdigitated sequences and Holocene evolution. The Anglian glacigenic sediments shown above in blue comprise the Lowestoft Formation and within them a single lens is identified (gsg1). Legend colours in many cases loosely correspond to the 50K published map sheets. The difficulty in separating the thin Thanet Sand Formation from the Reading Formation (Lambeth Group) has resulted in the use of the older Lower London Tertiaries term being used for this package of strata. The Harwich and London Clay Formations cannot be mapped out separately and are lumped together as the Thames Group.

	The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012<ref name="Mathers 2012">~~Mathers~~, S J. 2012. Model metadata summary report for the Ipswich-Sudbury LithoFrame 10-50 model. ''British Geological Survey Open Report OR/12/080''.</ref>), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.		The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012<ref name="Mathers 2012">MATHERS, S J. 2012. Model metadata summary report for the Ipswich-Sudbury LithoFrame 10-50 model. ''British Geological Survey Open Report OR/12/080''.</ref>), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.
	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}
	[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]		[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]

Ajhil at 11:37, 4 August 2021

2021-08-04T11:37:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 4 August 2021
Line 101:		Line 101:
	Multiple layers of storm beach deposits were needed to cope with interdigitated sequences and Holocene evolution. The Anglian glacigenic sediments shown above in blue comprise the Lowestoft Formation and within them a single lens is identified (gsg1). Legend colours in many cases loosely correspond to the 50K published map sheets. The difficulty in separating the thin Thanet Sand Formation from the Reading Formation (Lambeth Group) has resulted in the use of the older Lower London Tertiaries term being used for this package of strata. The Harwich and London Clay Formations cannot be mapped out separately and are lumped together as the Thames Group.		Multiple layers of storm beach deposits were needed to cope with interdigitated sequences and Holocene evolution. The Anglian glacigenic sediments shown above in blue comprise the Lowestoft Formation and within them a single lens is identified (gsg1). Legend colours in many cases loosely correspond to the 50K published map sheets. The difficulty in separating the thin Thanet Sand Formation from the Reading Formation (Lambeth Group) has resulted in the use of the older Lower London Tertiaries term being used for this package of strata. The Harwich and London Clay Formations cannot be mapped out separately and are lumped together as the Thames Group.

	The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012<ref name="Mathers 2012">Mathers, S J. 2012 Model metadata summary report for the Ipswich-Sudbury LithoFrame 10-50 model. ''British ~~Geololgical~~ Survey Open Report OR/12/080''.</ref>), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.		The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012<ref name="Mathers 2012">Mathers, S J. 2012. Model metadata summary report for the Ipswich-Sudbury LithoFrame 10-50 model. ''British Geological Survey Open Report OR/12/080''.</ref>), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.
	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}
	[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]		[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]

Ajhil at 10:40, 4 August 2021

2021-08-04T10:40:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 4 August 2021
Line 102:		Line 102:

	The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012<ref name="Mathers 2012">Mathers, S J. 2012 Model metadata summary report for the Ipswich-Sudbury LithoFrame 10-50 model. ''British Geololgical Survey Open Report OR/12/080''.</ref>), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.		The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012<ref name="Mathers 2012">Mathers, S J. 2012 Model metadata summary report for the Ipswich-Sudbury LithoFrame 10-50 model. ''British Geololgical Survey Open Report OR/12/080''.</ref>), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.
			==References==
			{{reflist}}
	[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]		[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]

Ajhil at 09:44, 4 August 2021

2021-08-04T09:44:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 4 August 2021
Line 65:		Line 65:
	\| Kesgrave Sand and Gravel		\| Kesgrave Sand and Gravel
	\|-		\|-
	\| BEDROCK		\|-
			\| '''BEDROCK'''
			\|-
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
Line 83:		Line 85:
	\|Gault Formation		\|Gault Formation
	\|-		\|-
	\|LENS		\|-
			\| '''LENS'''
			\|-
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-

Ajhil at 09:43, 4 August 2021

2021-08-04T09:43:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 4 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Geological units in the model are as follows		Geological units in the model are as follows:

	{\|		{\|
	\|code name		\| '''code name'''
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
Line 97:		Line 97:
	Multiple layers of storm beach deposits were needed to cope with interdigitated sequences and Holocene evolution. The Anglian glacigenic sediments shown above in blue comprise the Lowestoft Formation and within them a single lens is identified (gsg1). Legend colours in many cases loosely correspond to the 50K published map sheets. The difficulty in separating the thin Thanet Sand Formation from the Reading Formation (Lambeth Group) has resulted in the use of the older Lower London Tertiaries term being used for this package of strata. The Harwich and London Clay Formations cannot be mapped out separately and are lumped together as the Thames Group.		Multiple layers of storm beach deposits were needed to cope with interdigitated sequences and Holocene evolution. The Anglian glacigenic sediments shown above in blue comprise the Lowestoft Formation and within them a single lens is identified (gsg1). Legend colours in many cases loosely correspond to the 50K published map sheets. The difficulty in separating the thin Thanet Sand Formation from the Reading Formation (Lambeth Group) has resulted in the use of the older Lower London Tertiaries term being used for this package of strata. The Harwich and London Clay Formations cannot be mapped out separately and are lumped together as the Thames Group.

	The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.		The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012<ref name="Mathers 2012">Mathers, S J. 2012 Model metadata summary report for the Ipswich-Sudbury LithoFrame 10-50 model. ''British Geololgical Survey Open Report OR/12/080''.</ref>), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.
	[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]		[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]

Ajhil at 09:26, 4 August 2021

2021-08-04T09:26:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 4 August 2021
Line 98:		Line 98:

	The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.		The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.
	[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 02]]		[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model \| 03]]

Dbk: 1 revision imported

2021-07-26T14:07:46Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:07, 26 July 2021
(No difference)

Geosource>Albr at 15:39, 11 April 2018

2018-04-11T15:39:22Z

New page

Geological units in the model are as follows

{|
|code name
|
|-
| mgr
| Made ground
|-
| wgr
| Worked ground
|-
| wmgr
| Worked and made ground
|-
| stobco
| Shoreface and beach upper layer (along coast)
|-
| alv
| Main Freshwater Alluvium
|-
| itdu
| Intertidal Deposits undifferentiated
|-
| stob
| Shoreface and beach deposits lower layer
|-
| isc
| Interglacial silt and clay
|-
| head1
| Head (silt reworked loess?)
|-
| brk
| Brickearth (local overbank deposits on terraces)
|-
| rtdu
| River Terrace Deposits undifferentiated
|-
|lde1
|Lacustrine deposits (Clacton and Marks Tey)
|-
| gstc
| Glacial Silt and Clay supramain till
|-
| gsg
| Glacial Sand and Gravel supramain till
|-
| loft
| Lowestoft Till (main sheet)
|-
| gstcb1
| Glacial Silt and Clay below till 1
|-
| gsgb1
| Glacial Sand and Gravel below till 1
|-
| gcd
| Glacial Channel deposits
|-
| igd
| Interglacial deposits (Little Oakley)
|-
| kes
| Kesgrave Sand and Gravel
|-
| BEDROCK
|
|-
| rcg
| Red Crag Formation
|-
| tham
| Thames Group
|-
| llte
| Lower London Tertiaries
|-
| ck
| Chalk Group undiff
|-
|glt
|Gault Formation
|-
|LENS
|
|-
| gsg1t
| Glacial Sand and Gravel in main till sheet (top)
|-
| gsg1
| Glacial Sand and Gravel in main till sheet (base)
|}

The sequence shares a common *.gvs with the adjacent Ipswich-Sudbury area model.

Multiple layers of storm beach deposits were needed to cope with interdigitated sequences and Holocene evolution. The Anglian glacigenic sediments shown above in blue comprise the Lowestoft Formation and within them a single lens is identified (gsg1). Legend colours in many cases loosely correspond to the 50K published map sheets. The difficulty in separating the thin Thanet Sand Formation from the Reading Formation (Lambeth Group) has resulted in the use of the older Lower London Tertiaries term being used for this package of strata. The Harwich and London Clay Formations cannot be mapped out separately and are lumped together as the Thames Group.

The model abuts the Ipswich-Sudbury model to the north (Mathers, 2012), shared docker sections ensure a common interpretation along the join at northing 30.
[[Category:OR/13/001 Model metadata summary report for the Colchester LithoFrame 10-50 model | 02]]